Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:12:53 +0100 | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family |
| |
On 01/13/2012 07:16 PM, Greg KH : > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >>> Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be >>> difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and >>> remove LOC during current cleanup process. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> Hi Andrew, Greg, >> >> Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file? > > Why wouldn't the maintainers of the feature you are saying is going away > be the ones responsible for submitting this?
Actually, I am the guy ;-)
>> It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also: >> >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> >> >> Or tell me to resend a complete patch. >> >> Thanks for your help, best regards, >> >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 >>> Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around >>> for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. >>> Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com> >>> + >>> +---------------------------- >>> + >>> +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed >>> +When: 3.4 >>> +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c >>> +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. >>> +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> >>> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > Ok, why not send this through the ARM tree? Why need me and Andrew?
Ok, I though there was a special procedure for this file. I will queue this one in arm-soc tree.
Thanks, best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre
| |