lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 -mm] make swapin readahead skip over holes
On 01/11/2012 04:42 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:30:12PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 01/11/2012 04:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 02:30:44PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>> Ever since abandoning the virtual scan of processes, for scalability
>>>> reasons, swap space has been a little more fragmented than before.
>>>> This can lead to the situation where a large memory user is killed,
>>>> swap space ends up full of "holes" and swapin readahead is totally
>>>> ineffective.
>>>>
>>>> On my home system, after killing a leaky firefox it took over an
>>>> hour to page just under 2GB of memory back in, slowing the virtual
>>>> machines down to a crawl.
>>>>
>>>> This patch makes swapin readahead simply skip over holes, instead
>>>> of stopping at them. This allows the system to swap things back in
>>>> at rates of several MB/second, instead of a few hundred kB/second.
>>>>
>>>> The checks done in valid_swaphandles are already done in
>>>> read_swap_cache_async as well, allowing us to remove a fair amount
>>>> of code.
>>>
>>> __swap_duplicate() also checks for whether the offset is within the
>>> swap device range. Do you think we could remove get_swap_cluster()
>>> altogether and just try reading the aligned page_cluster range?
>>
>> That is how I implemented it originally, but we need
>> to take the swap_lock so it is cleaner to implement
>> a helper function in swapfile.c :)
>
> AFAICS, it's only needed to validate the offset against si->max, but
> this too is done in __swap_duplicate().
>
> What's otherwise left is just rounding down swp_offset(entry) and
> adding 1<< page_cluster to it, that shouldn't need the swap_lock?
>
> Am I missing something?

Good point. I guess we could get rid of get_swap_cluster
afterall and let __swap_duplicate deal with everything.

Andrew, Mel, is that ok with you?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-11 23:01    [W:0.040 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site