lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/9] block: block_bio_complete tracepoint was missing
Hello,

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:25:32PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:28 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > block_bio_complete tracepoint was defined but not invoked anywhere.
> > Fix it.
> >
> > -tj: This will generate duplicate BLK_TA_COMPLETEs. Namhyung is
> > working on proper solution.
> >
> > DO_NOT_APPLY
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > fs/bio.c | 3 +++
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
> > index b1fe82c..96548da 100644
> > --- a/fs/bio.c
> > +++ b/fs/bio.c
> > @@ -1447,6 +1447,9 @@ void bio_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
> > else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
> > error = -EIO;
> >
> > + if (bio->bi_bdev)
> > + trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev),
> > + bio, error);
>
> I thought I commented before about using TRACE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL() here.
> To remove that open coded branch.

Yeah but this particular patch is dead now so it's a bit pointless.
ioblame:ioblame_io uses it FWIW. Namhyung, can you please consider
using TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() for you patches if applicable?

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-11 18:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans