Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Question] sched: Should balance_iterator be removed? | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:44:24 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 22:10 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote: > Hello all, > > Commit 4a55bd5e97b1775913 (sched: fair-group: de-couple load-balancing > from the rb-trees) added balance_iterator in cfs_rq. But, no real use > in current code. Shouldn't it be removed? Or has it been kept for > future use?
Nope its dead wood, thanks for spotting it.
| |