Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:01:10 +0800 | From | Yong Zhang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/62] m64k: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED |
| |
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:18, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> wrote: > > On 07/09/11 18:10, Yong Zhang wrote: > >> > >> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com> > > > > Looks ok to me: > > > > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > > Except for the subject, it's m68k, not m64k ;-)
Sorry for the typo.
> > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> > > Sorry, I missed the introductary email [0/62].
I sent it out, but seems it didn't reach LKML due to the compromise of kernel.org.
> But do you expect the individual > maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?
Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS): [ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.
Alternatively I can pick the whole MIPS bunch as well. I let Ralf decide. ]
So the same rule here, you can decide it :)
Thanks, Yong
| |