[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Why I want PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP option
    On 09/09, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > To me, the rationale presented here almost argues against

    Personally I dislike PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP too.

    And once again, this needs more (nontrivial) changes than just
    s/PT_SEIZED/PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP/, the patch was wrong.

    And, just for example. While this is minor, I'd like to improve
    the error codes from ptrace_check_attach(). Until we drop
    PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL we can safely do this. I don't think it makes
    sense to add the new PTRACE_O for this.

    And finally, I simply do not understand how it can be useful.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-09 18:25    [W:0.021 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site