[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why I want PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP option
On 09/09, Tejun Heo wrote:
> To me, the rationale presented here almost argues against

Personally I dislike PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP too.

And once again, this needs more (nontrivial) changes than just
s/PT_SEIZED/PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP/, the patch was wrong.

And, just for example. While this is minor, I'd like to improve
the error codes from ptrace_check_attach(). Until we drop
PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL we can safely do this. I don't think it makes
sense to add the new PTRACE_O for this.

And finally, I simply do not understand how it can be useful.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-09 18:25    [W:0.075 / U:2.680 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site