[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] percpu_counter: Put a reasonable upper bound on percpu_counter_batch

Hi Ted,

> Um, this was an ext4 patch and I pointed out it could cause
> problems. (Specifically, data loss…)

I'm a bit confused. While the comment mentions ext4, the patch is just
putting an upper bound on the size of percpu_counter_batch and it is
useful for percpu_counter_compare() too:

static void compute_batch_value(void)
int nr = num_online_cpus();

- percpu_counter_batch = max(32, nr*2);
+ /*
+ * The cutoff point for the percpu_counter_compare() fast path grows
+ * at num_online_cpus^2 and on a big enough machine it will be
+ * unlikely to hit.
+ * We clamp the batch value to 1024 so the cutoff point only grows
+ * linearly past 512 CPUs.
+ */
+ percpu_counter_batch = clamp(nr*2, 32, 1024);

The batch value should be opaque to the rest of the kernel. If ext4
requires a specific batch value we can use the functions that take
an explicit one (eg __percpu_counter_add).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-07 19:09    [W:0.033 / U:2.348 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site