Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:35:15 -0500 | From | Grant Likely <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: Support driver probe deferral |
| |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:11:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > If we fail to locate a requested regulator return -EAGAIN. If drivers > pass this error code through to their caller (which they really should) > then this will ensure that the probe is retried later when further devices > become available. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Manjunath, can you add this to a series with the deferred probe patch? You'll need to change the return code as discussed in the other thread.
g.
> --- > > This depends on Grant's change to implement deferred probing, the error > code for which is going to change in the next revision. Liam, if you're > also OK with this change I propose that we both ack it and let it get > carried along with the deferred probing change. > > drivers/regulator/core.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c > index d5656b7..b39ec9f 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c > @@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id, > { > struct regulator_dev *rdev; > struct regulator_map *map; > - struct regulator *regulator = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + struct regulator *regulator = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); > const char *devname = NULL; > int ret; > > @@ -2727,7 +2727,7 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, > if (!found) { > dev_err(dev, "Failed to find supply %s\n", > init_data->supply_regulator); > - ret = -ENODEV; > + ret = -EAGAIN; > goto scrub; > } > > -- > 1.7.6.3 >
| |