Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:03:39 -0300 | From | Glauber Costa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller |
| |
On 09/27/2011 09:58 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:18:39 -0300 > Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com> wrote: > >> On 09/26/2011 07:34 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:39 -0300 >>> Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com> wrote: > "If parent sets use_hierarchy==1, children must have the same kmem_independent value >>> with parant's one." >>> >>> How do you think ? I think a hierarchy must have the same config. >> BTW, Kame: >> >> Look again (I forgot myself when I first replied to you) >> Only in the root cgroup those files get registered. >> So shouldn't be a problem, because children won't even >> be able to see them. >> >> Do you agree with this ? >> > > agreed. >
Actually it is the other way around, following previous suggestions...
The root cgroup does *not* get those files registered, since we don't intend to do any kernel memory limitation for it. The others get it. Given that, I will proceed writing some code to respect parent cgroup's hierarchy.
| |