Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:56:29 -0700 | | From | Tim Bird <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add accurate boot timing to a Linux system |
| |
On 09/23/2011 04:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > This experimental patch set adds boot timing to a Linux system. The > timing starts with the boot loader and extends through the kernel into > user space to the completion of the boot process. The timing starts when > the system leaves reset, not later when the kernel starts.
I would be very interested in this. This is something that would be very helpful, I believe, to assist with optimizing overall boot time.
> Finally, in user space there is no kernel-blessed way to record > timestamps. One approach is to add lines to the init scripts like > 'cat /proc/uptime >/tmp/login_starts'. > This creates another place where > the boot timing tool must look for information.
'cat /proc/uptime >/dev/kmsg' (with printk timestamps on) is much better than the above, for this reason.
> This Patchset > ------------- > This patchset aims to unify timing in one place: a simple driver which > collects pre-kernel boot timestamps, adds its own as it boots, with > calls to bootstage_mark(), then allows user space (init, etc.) to add > more with 'echo "message" >>/sys/kernel/debug/bootstage/mask'. > > Finally it permits user space to access the full list of timestamps > with 'cat /sys/kernel/debug/bootstage/report', which has two columns: > the stage name and the timestamp: > > reset 0 > arch_cpu_init-AVP 258902 > arch_cpu_init-A9 263267 > arch_cpu_init-done 263312 > board_init_f-start 263314 > board_init_r-start 323671 > main_loop 573008 ...
I would prefer the timestamp in the first column. Also, for consistency it would be good if it used the same format as printk timestamps: "[%5lu.%06lu]" with seconds and micro-seconds in the respective fields. Then, existing tools like scripts/show_delta and scripts/bootgraph.pl could work on this data as well.
Full micro-second granularity is not required, but it's nice to keep the format the same, whether the clock supports it or not.
Finally, is this work related at all to this: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-September/099996.html Bootgraph.pl instrumentation support for UBoot ??
Just wondering.
Thanks - this looks like great stuff! -- Tim
============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Workgroup of the Linux Foundation Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Network Entertainment =============================
|  |