lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NFS client growing system CPU
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:42:53AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 17:39 -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Following up on "System CPU increasing on idle 2.6.36", this issue is
> > still happening even on 3.1-rc7. So, since it has been 9 months since I
> > reported this, I figured I'd bisect this issue. The first bisection ended
> > in an IPMI regression that looked like the problem, so I had to start
> > again. Eventually, I got commit b80c3cb628f0ebc241b02e38dd028969fb8026a2
> > which made it into 2.6.34-rc4.
> >
> > With this commit, system CPU keeps rising as the log crunch box runs
> > (reads log files via NFS and spews out HTML files into NFS-mounted report
> > directories). When it finishes the daily run, the system time stays
> > non-zero and continues to be higher and higher after each run, until the
> > box never completes a run within a day due to all of the wasted cycles.
>
> So reverting that commit fixes the problem on 3.1-rc7?
>
> As far as I can see, doing so should be safe thanks to commit
> 5547e8aac6f71505d621a612de2fca0dd988b439 (writeback: Update dirty flags
> in two steps) which fixes the original problem at the VFS level.

Hmm, I went to git revert b80c3cb628f0ebc241b02e38dd028969fb8026a2, but
for some reason git left the nfs_mark_request_dirty(req); line in
nfs_writepage_setup(), even though the original commit had that. Is that
OK or should I remove that as well?

Once that is sorted, I'll build it and let it run for a day and let you
know. Thanks!

Simon-


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-27 18:51    [W:0.088 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site