[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] gpio-vx855: Add device tree binding
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Mark Brown
<> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:02:14PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> +- #gpio-cells : Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and the
>> +  second cell is used to specify optional parameters:
>> +  - bit 0 specifies polarity (0 for normal, 1 for inverted)
> Shouldn't we just have a property for the polarity?

Can't comment on the general design, but the way it is
described/implemented in the patch is consistent with GPIO controllers
in general in the kernel. e.g. its the same as gpio_nvidia, and it is
then driven by the generic gpio/dt code rather than having to
implement extra stuff in the vx855 driver.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-21 15:07    [W:0.024 / U:1.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site