[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Introduce checks for preemptable code for this_cpu_read/write()
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:03 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Well yes the misunderstanding of per cpu operations was one reason why I
> proposed the discussion on the subject of esoteric kernel synchronization.
> I do not think that it was accepted.

I don't think anybody here misunderstands it, we're just all very angry
that its causing so much problems.

__this_cpu doesn't have preempt debug checks, and there's a lot of
this_cpu usage that really should have been __this_cpu.

The very fact that a quick scan still reveals actual bugs should be a
warning sign that this crap doesn't have enough sanity checks.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-20 17:11    [W:0.084 / U:18.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site