Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:21:29 +0530 | | From | Kamalesh Babulal <> | | Subject | Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2011-09-15 23:48:43]:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 23:25 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > 2.6.38 | 1551 | 48 | 62 | 47 | 50 | > > ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ > > 2.6.39 | 3784 | 457 | 722 | 3209 | 1037 | > > I'd say we wrecked it going from .38 to .39 and only made it worse after > that.
after reverting the commit 866ab43efd325fae8889ea, of the patches went between .38 and .39 reduces the ping pong of the tasks.
------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ Kernel | Run 1 | Run 2 | Run 3 | Run 4 | Run 5 | ------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ 2.6.39 | 1542 | 2172 | 2727 | 120 | 3681 | ------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ 2.6.39 (with | | | | | | 866ab43efd reverted) | 65 | 78 | 58 | 99 | 62 | ------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ 3.1-rc4+tip | | | | | | (e467f18f945c) | 1219 | 2037 | 1943 | 772 | 1701 | ------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ 3.1-rc4+tip (e467f18f9) | | | | | | (866ab43efd reverted) | 64 | 45 | 59 | 59 | 69 | ------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
Thanks, Kamalesh.
|  |