lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2011-09-13 10:33:06]:

> * Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2011-09-13 09:45:45]:
>
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2011-09-12 14:35:43]:
> >
> > > Of course it does.. and I bet you can improve that slightly if you
> > > manage to fix some of the numerical nightmares that live in the cgroup
> > > load-balancer (Paul, care to share your WIP?)
> >
> > Booting with "nohz=off" also helps significantly.
> >
> > With nohz=on, average idle time (over 1 min) is 10.3%
> > With nohz=off, average idle time (over 1 min) is 3.9%
>
> Tuning min_interval and max_interval of various sched_domains to 1 [a]

Forgot to add footnote (a) earlier. min and max_interval tuned as
below:

# cd /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain
# for i in `find . -name min_interval`; do echo 1 > $i; done
# for i in `find . -name max_interval`; do echo 1 > $i; done

- vatsa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-13 07:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog