Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede | | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | | Date | Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:39:48 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:33 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > This is perhaps not optimal (as it may lead to more lock contentions), but > something to note for those who care for both capping and utilization in > equal measure!
You meant lock inversion, which leads to more idle time :-)
|  |