[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:33 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> This is perhaps not optimal (as it may lead to more lock contentions), but
> something to note for those who care for both capping and utilization in
> equal measure!

You meant lock inversion, which leads to more idle time :-)

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-13 11:43    [W:0.114 / U:2.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site