[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] random: add blocking facility to urandom
    On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:02:43AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
    > Ted Ts'o wrote:
    > >On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:26:35PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
    > >>We're looking for a generic solution here that doesn't require
    > >>re-educating every single piece of userspace. And anything done in
    > >>userspace is going to be full of possible holes -- there needs to be
    > >>something in place that actually *enforces* the policy, and
    > >>centralized accounting/tracking, lest you wind up with multiple
    > >>processes racing to grab the entropy.
    > >
    > >Yeah, but there are userspace programs that depend on urandom not
    > >blocking... so your proposed change would break them.
    > I'm already consigned to the fact this isn't going to fly, but I'm
    > still curious to know examples of programs that are going to break
    > here, for my own education. Its already possible for urandom reads
    > to fail as the code is now (-ERESTARTSYS and -EFAULT are possible),
    > so a sane program ought to already be handling error cases, though
    > not -EAGAIN, which this would add.
    Its not a failure return code here, its the possibility of no return code at all
    (i.e. indefinte blocking). While I can't cite a specific application the
    failure profile would be an application holding a critical system resource say a
    manditory file lock that several applications require to do their work). If the
    application that holds said lock blocks on urandom (having previously correctly
    assumed that no blocking could occur), all applications requiring access to that
    file lock then in turn block indefinately, violating any time critical deadlines
    they may have.


    > --
    > Jarod Wilson
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-12 17:01    [W:0.024 / U:6.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site