[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] GPIOLIB: add generic gpio_set_pull API
    On 8/8/2011 3:57 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
    > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Grant Likely<> wrote:
    >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Paul Mundt<> wrote:
    >>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:19:33PM -0700, Barry Song wrote:
    >>>> Now there are many different implementations for GPIO pull configuration, for
    >>>> example:
    >>>> s3c_gpio_setpull()
    >>>> tegra_pinmux_set_pullupdown()
    >>>> chipcHw_setPinPullup()
    >>>> gpio_pullup()
    >>>> s3c2410_gpio_pullup()
    >>>> This patch adds a new generic gpio_set_pull API so that all SoCs can have unified
    >>>> codes.
    >>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song<>
    >>> For arch/arm/mach-shmobile we also have gpio_pull_up() for board-g4evm.c
    >>> and gpio_pull_down() for board-mackerel.c. Both of these would benefit
    >>> from this sort of an API addition.
    >> I think I'm okay with this API change. Linus, what say you? How does
    >> this interact with your plans for pinctrl?
    > If gpiolib accept the pullup control. gpiolib is better place to
    > control gpio config.
    > then remains are the gpio driver strength, and power down mode
    > control. powerdown pull-up/down, powerdown in/out at samsung gpios.
    If we add this API - the remaining gpio controls like drive strength and
    function select could also be added, which eats into the pinmux domain.
    Linus W. had a patch earlier which added an API for a gpio config to be
    specified through gpiolib. " gpio: add a custom configuration mechanism
    to gpiolib" which is sort of an extensible model of this API.

    > _______________________________________________
    > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at
    > Please read the FAQ at

    Rohit Vaswani

    Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
    The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-09 03:47    [W:0.023 / U:2.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site