lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mmotm 1/2] fault-injection: improve naming of public function should_fail()
From
On 8 August 2011 18:16, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>:
>> rename fault injection function should_fail() to fault_should_fail()
>
> fault_should_fail sounds tautological.
> fault_should_inject() is better, but I'm not sure.
> Should we retain the naming issue and go forward to merge mmc fault
> injection first?
>
Fine with me.
I'll go ahead and prepare the mmc failt-injection patches based on
current naming.

Thanks,
Per


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-08 20:21    [W:0.040 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site