Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:19:10 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mmotm 1/2] fault-injection: improve naming of public function should_fail() | From | Per Forlin <> |
| |
On 8 August 2011 18:16, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/8/1 Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>: >> rename fault injection function should_fail() to fault_should_fail() > > fault_should_fail sounds tautological. > fault_should_inject() is better, but I'm not sure. > Should we retain the naming issue and go forward to merge mmc fault > injection first? > Fine with me. I'll go ahead and prepare the mmc failt-injection patches based on current naming.
Thanks, Per
| |