lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Having perf use libparsevent.a

    * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

    > By keeping the code separate from perf, made the transition from
    > trace-cmd to tools much easier. I've wasted too many days trying to
    > get other ways working, and I don't want to rewrite perf to do so.

    But we want to move tools together, not further apart. Every code
    activity i see from you is trying to tear apart instrumentation
    tooling - while previously you agreed that it should be unified. So
    why not do tools/perf/lib/ as you agreed before?

    I'm really not interested in seeing the libdrm/libdri mess repeated.
    Libraries have their uses when there's some very important external
    interface, but here it's actively harmful as it complicates and
    hardcodes APIs into ABIs that are clearly not finished yet.

    Really, lets not be stupid here.

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-05 23:27    [W:4.431 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site