[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size
    On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Johannes Weiner <> wrote:
    > Reclaim decides to skip scanning an active list when the corresponding
    > inactive list is above a certain size in comparison to leave the
    > assumed working set alone while there are still enough reclaim
    > candidates around.
    > The memcg implementation of comparing those lists instead reports
    > whether the whole memcg is low on the requested type of inactive
    > pages, considering all nodes and zones.
    > This can lead to an oversized active list not being scanned because of
    > the state of the other lists in the memcg, as well as an active list
    > being scanned while its corresponding inactive list has enough pages.
    > Not only is this wrong, it's also a scalability hazard, because the
    > global memory state over all nodes and zones has to be gathered for
    > each memcg and zone scanned.
    > Make these calculations purely based on the size of the two LRU lists
    > that are actually affected by the outcome of the decision.
    > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <>
    > Cc: Rik van Riel <>
    > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <>
    > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <>
    > Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <>
    > Cc: Balbir Singh <>

    Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <>

    I can't understand why memcg is designed for considering all nodes and zones.
    Is it a mistake or on purpose?
    Maybe Kame or Balbir can answer it.

    Anyway, this change does make sense to me.

    Nitpick: Please remove inactive_ratio in Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt.
    I think it would be better to separate it into another patch.

    Kind regards,
    Minchan Kim

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-31 12:15    [W:0.021 / U:2.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site