lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ?
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:51:03PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello Greg ,
>
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >> Hello All , Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm
> >>stable ?
> >
> >No, why would they?
> >
> >Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable
> >longer kernel to maintain? What are you using it for that requires it
> >to be handled in this manner?
> >thanks,
> >greg k-h
> Probably no reason at all , But ... It is the final 2.6 kernel version .

But what does that really mean? There is no "real" difference between
2.6.39 and 3.0 that is not the same difference between 2.6.38 and
2.6.39.

> With 3.0 being released there will only be Yours & the others
> maintaining the 2.6.<39 otherwise .

Is that a problem?

> Ego I guess .

Whose?

confused.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-04 02:59    [W:0.050 / U:0.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site