Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:54:23 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ? |
| |
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:51:03PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > Hello Greg , > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > >> Hello All , Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm > >>stable ? > > > >No, why would they? > > > >Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable > >longer kernel to maintain? What are you using it for that requires it > >to be handled in this manner? > >thanks, > >greg k-h > Probably no reason at all , But ... It is the final 2.6 kernel version .
But what does that really mean? There is no "real" difference between 2.6.39 and 3.0 that is not the same difference between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39.
> With 3.0 being released there will only be Yours & the others > maintaining the 2.6.<39 otherwise .
Is that a problem?
> Ego I guess .
Whose?
confused.
greg k-h
| |