Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:51:03 -0800 (AKDT) | From | "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <> | Subject | Re: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ? |
| |
Hello Greg ,
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: >> Hello All , Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm >> stable ? > > No, why would they? > > Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable > longer kernel to maintain? What are you using it for that requires it > to be handled in this manner? > thanks, > greg k-h Probably no reason at all , But ... It is the final 2.6 kernel version .
With 3.0 being released there will only be Yours & the others maintaining the 2.6.<39 otherwise .
Ego I guess .
Thank you for responding .
Twyl , JimL -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network&System Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux | | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP | +------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |