[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Drbd-dev] [RFC 000/118] drbd: part 1 of adding multiple volume support to drbd
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Philipp Reisner
<> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 26. August 2011, 15:20:51 schrieb Greg Freemyer:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Philipp Reisner <
>>> wrote:
>> > This the first request for review of drbd-8.4. The complete set has
>> > 500 patches. In this first series there are only 118 of these.
>> Lars,
>> I've only taken a quick glance, but is drbd functional between applying
>> each patch?
>> It doesn't look like it to me, but I didn't look that close.  I also saw at
>> least one patch that introduced a new function with no caller to test it.
>> The idea is that a patch series leave a testable / functional kernel after
>> each patch in the series is applied sequentially.
>> That is the only way git bisect can do its job.
>> ie. Introducing a new function but no new caller makes a change, but there
>> is no way to test it.  Therefore there is no real value in not merging that
>> patch with one that has the new call in it.
> Greg,
> You replied to mail 000. Please point out to which patch/function you
> refer, so that we can fix this.
> Best,
>  Phil


Take a look at patch 115 of 118 in your series. I did not review the
whole series, I just poked around briefly and noticed this one.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-29 15:29    [W:0.331 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site