[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 14:14 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > good in that it only takes 1 syscall and ours takes 2. Your interface
> > is bad in that it is ioctl and we are told since birth that we must
> > hate them no matter what (not that read/write is really any
> > different). It isn't the same method the only other LSM I know about
> > uses. It can only every return one value (ok, I know ioctl can be
> > made to do anything at all)
> I'm all in favour of the use of brains rather than the cult of ioctl
> hating. You can design bad ioctls and good ones. Also ioctl is pretty
> much unique in being bidirectional, it allows a query/respose action
> without having to worry about whether the respose is the one to your
> query or another parallel query.

The transaction ops achieve that property as well - the response is
stored in an open file private buffer and thus can only correspond to a
request written to that same open file instance.

Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-26 19:39    [W:0.073 / U:1.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site