[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree
On 08/25/2011 11:13 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 09:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h between a series of commits from the tip
>> tree and a smaller series of similar commits from the xen tree.
>> I see that Linus is commenting on these patches at the moment, and its
>> not easy to resolve the conflicts, so I will just use the xen tree from
>> next-20110824 for today.
> Thanks Stephen; the xen tree ones are more current, and I want to make
> sure I didn't screw up any of the cmpxchg/xadd changes in a wider test env.

Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
should be dropped.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-25 20:29    [W:0.038 / U:8.448 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site