lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 17/43] microblaze: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/24, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:49 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> v2 of this patch depends on "[PATCH 01/43] signal: Add block_sigmask()
>>>> for adding sigmask to current->blocked" so they need to go through the
>>>> same tree but this patch would benefit from some maintainer ACK's.
>>> Please add there my ACK to it too.
>
> Thanks Michal.
>
>>> I will add patches 14-16/43 v2 to microblaze next branch keep them
>>> for a while. I will propose them to Linus tree for v3.2.
>> Actually, I just realised this is where it gets a little complicated. If
>> you take those 3 patches and they're not in Oleg's tree, [PATCH 17/43]
>> doesn't apply cleanly. Fixing 17/43 up so it applies without patches
>> 14-16 would result in something like this in handle_signal(),
>>
>> if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
>> block_sigmask(ka, sig);
>> }
>> return 1;
>>
>> Which Linus would have to fixup to its original form when he merges the
>> two trees. I think all the microblaze patches should go through Oleg's
>> tree,
>
> Agreed, this looks simpler.
>
> Michal, unless you object, I am going to add the microblaze changes
> (with your acks) to ptrace branch, it already has 01/43 which adds
> block_sigmask().
>
> OK?

No problem.

Thanks,
Michal


--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-24 16:05    [W:2.329 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site