lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api
From
Date
On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Koul, Vinod wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
>>> DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better
>>> approach as this can give client ability to configure each transfer
>>> rather than set for the channel. Linus W, do you agree?
>>
>> I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on
>> using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is better
>> suited than anyone else of us to select what scheme to use,
>> in the end he's going to write the first code using the API.
> And Unfortunately TI folks don't seem to care about this discussion :(
> Haven't seen anything on this from them, or on previous RFC by Jassi

IIRC, Sundaram went on holiday. I suspect he cares a lot about this
discussion as he has a session on the topic at LPC.

-Matt


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-23 16:45    [W:0.318 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site