[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: boot test failure (net tree)

[Added linux-kbuild@ to the Cc: list.]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:13 PM, David Miller <> wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <>
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:41:29 +1000
>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:40:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:30:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Here's what I am applying as a merge fixup to the net tree today so that
>>> > my ppc64_defconfig builds actually build more or less the same set of
>>> > drivers as before this rearrangement.
>>> And this today:
>> And this:
> I'm starting to get uncomfortable with this whole situation, and I
> feel more and more that these new kconfig guards are not tenable.
> Changing defconfig files might fix the "automated test boot with
> defconfig" case but it won't fix the case of someone trying to
> automate a build and boot using a different, existing, config file.
> It ought to work too, and I do know people really do this.
> And just the fact that we would have to merge all of these defconfig changes
> through the networking tree is evidence of how it's really not reasonable
> to be doing things this way.
> Jeff, I think we need to revert the dependencies back to what they were
> before the drivers/net moves.  Could you prepare a patch which does that?
Are you implying we need some kind of way to migrate config ?

- Arnaud
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-23 05:53    [W:0.036 / U:20.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site