[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/32] Nohz cpusets (was: Nohz Tasks)
    On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <> wrote:
    >> Why not do it unconditionally?  That is, if all the conditions are
    >> fulfilled, disable the tick regardless of any cpuset settings.
    > Because I'm not sure it's a win on every workload. This involves
    > some hooks here and there (syscall slow path), IPIs, etc...

    I agree with Avi. I'd be inclined to investigate further to see if
    there are any important workloads on which it's not a win - and then
    add the extra complexity to control it from cpusets if necessary.
    Unless there's really a good reason to make it configurable, it's
    simpler to make it unconditional.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-20 09:49    [W:0.019 / U:29.844 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site