Messages in this thread |  | | Date | 20 Aug 2011 23:04:15 -0400 | | From | "George Spelvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve sequence number generation. |
| |
>> * Should I worry about 32-bit IPv6 performance, since that's even more >> unlikely to be running heavy loads on 32-bit hardware?
> On x86 you're probably right, but there are other very fast platforms > such as ARM, which are used to build routers or appliances, and which > are 32-bit and there it may matter.
Thanks for the feedback. Your point about routers is well-taken. It's particularly x86-32 which gives me fits, but I'll keep ARM performance in mind, too.
>> * If yes, is this fast enough to be acceptable, or do I need to work >> harder to find more speed?
> I'd suggest that the most important is no performance regression. Probably > that if you can bring something which brings back what we lost with MD5, > your work would gain interest.
Okay, I'll go back to the drawing board on performance.
Damn, this is going to be tough.
> I'm copy-pasting here the memo I exchanged in private after my tests, there > is nothing secret in it, so better post the whole explanation :
Thank you very much. It helps me figure out what the time budget is.
|  |