[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] x86/spinlocks optional for 3.1
On 08/01/2011 06:02 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 05:04 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> If that xadd implementation could perhaps be shared, I wouldn't hate
>> it so much. As it is, I really don't see the point in pulling this.
> OK, no problem. We'll rework it for 3.2.

Agreed. The xadd helper is actually identical between the two, aside
from the 64-bit form. I was following the form of cmpchg_32/64.h, but
to be honest I don't understand why they're separate. Is it some
remaining TBD unification?


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-02 19:05    [W:0.060 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site