Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:19:44 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
2011/8/19 Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@intel.com>: > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
>> I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on >> using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is better >> suited than anyone else of us to select what scheme to use, >> in the end he's going to write the first code using the API.
> And Unfortunately TI folks don't seem to care about this discussion :( > Haven't seen anything on this from them, or on previous RFC by Jassi
Well if there is no code usig the API then there is no rush in merging it either I guess. Whenever someone (TI or Samsung) cook some driver patches they can choose their approach.
Thanks, Linus Walleij
| |