[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod <> wrote:
> > Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
> > DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better
> > approach as this can give client ability to configure each transfer
> > rather than set for the channel. Linus W, do you agree?
> I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on
> using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is better
> suited than anyone else of us to select what scheme to use,
> in the end he's going to write the first code using the API.
And Unfortunately TI folks don't seem to care about this discussion :(
Haven't seen anything on this from them, or on previous RFC by Jassi


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-19 15:47    [W:0.140 / U:14.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site