Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:35:23 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init |
| |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:17:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:02:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > > > Please see the attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the > > > > > > > problem nicely. Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > Good to hear! I guess I should keep it, then. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3? I haven't seen > > > > > it come across LKML yet. > > > > > > > > I might... But does it qualify as a regression? That part of the > > > > code hasn't changed for some time now. > > > > > > It's a fix for a problem that is newly surfaced in 3.1. A regression, > > > likely not since it's been there forever, but new debugging options > > > uncovered it. I'm pretty sure the -rc stage takes fixes even if they > > > aren't regressions. > > > > Nope, after -rc1 only regressions fixes are taken (most of the time). > > Sigh. > > Look, either way I'm carrying this patch in Fedora because it fixes > a bug that is actually being reported by users (and by abrtd as well). > If you both want to wait until 3.2 to actually submit it to Linus, > then OK. > > Honestly, I'm just glad we actually run with the debug options enabled > (which seems to be a rare thing) so bugs like this are actually found. > Thanks for the fix.
I am sorry, but I didn't make the rules! And I must carry the fix longer as well, if that makes you feel any better.
Thanx, Paul
| |