Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:43:47 +0200 | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] [PATCH] include storage keys in hibernation image. |
| |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:56:47 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2011, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > > > > For s390 there is one additional byte associated with each page, > > the storage key. This byte contains the referenced and changed > > bits and needs to be included into the hibernation image. > > If the storage keys are not restored to their previous state all > > original pages would appear to be dirty. This can cause > > inconsistencies e.g. with read-only filesystems. > > > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> > > Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > > OK, I don't have any complaints. Do you want me to take this > patch or do you want to push it through the s390 tree?
The patch affects the common power management code. At minimum I would like an acked-by to take it into the s390 tree. I would feel more comfortable if you'd take it via the power management tree though.
-- blue skies, Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
| |