Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/41] microblaze: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv() | From | Matt Fleming <> | Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:25:25 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:14 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Assuming the changelog is fixed, > > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Thanks!
> > If you want to propose 12-15 through my Microblaze tree, please let me know. > > Probably this is the best option. Matt, what do you think?
Yeah, that seems like the best solution. All of the patches are independent so it's easy for the respective maintainers to apply them when they're ready.
I'll be sending out updated versions today.
-- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| |