lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: x86 memcpy performance
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:59:10 +0200, Borislav Petkov said:

    > Benchmarking with 10000 iterations, average results:
    > size XM MM speedup
    > 119 540.58 449.491 0.8314969419

    > 12273 2307.86 4042.88 1.751787902
    > 13924 2431.8 4224.48 1.737184756
    > 14335 2469.4 4218.82 1.708440514
    > 15018 2675.67 1904.07 0.711622886
    > 16374 2989.75 5296.26 1.771470902
    > 24564 4262.15 7696.86 1.805863077
    > 27852 4362.53 3347.72 0.7673805572
    > 28672 5122.8 7113.14 1.388524413
    > 30033 4874.62 8740.04 1.792967931

    The numbers for 15018 and 27852 are *way* odd for the MM case. I don't feel
    really good about this till we understand what happened for those two cases.

    Also, anytime I see "10000 iterations", I ask myself if the benchmark rigging
    took proper note of hot/cold cache issues. That *may* explain the two oddball
    results we see above - but not knowing more about how it was benched, it's hard
    to say.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-16 04:39    [W:2.465 / U:0.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site