Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:47:23 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag |
| |
On 08/15/2011 01:23 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:27:53 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> On 08/15/2011 10:39 AM, Mike Waychison wrote: >>>> >>>> I would like to see the <id@owner> format I mentioned. >>> >>> Is there a middle ground if we say: >>> >>> Internal-reference-ID: <arbitrarytextforid@owner> >>> >>> so >>> >>> Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap> >>> Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@google> >>> >> >> Personally I don't care if they are separate lines or all on the same line. > > I don't understand how that answers Mike's question... > Then I don't understand the question.
I proposed:
Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap> <33999@google>
Mike proposed:
Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap> Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@google>
The only difference I see is if they are on the same line, which I don't personally care about.
-hpa
| |