[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: x86 memcpy performance

* melwyn lobo <> wrote:

> Hi All,
> Our Video recorder application uses memcpy for every frame. About 2KB
> data every frame on Intel® Atom™ Z5xx processor.
> With default 2.6.35 kernel we got 19.6 fps. But it seems kernel
> implemented memcpy is suboptimal, because when we replaced
> with an optmized one (using ssse3, exact patches are currently being
> finalized) ew obtained 22fps a gain of 12.2 %.
> C0 residency also reduced from 75% to 67%. This means power benefits too.
> My questions:
> 1. Is kernel memcpy profiled for optimal performance.
> 2. Does the default kernel configuration for i386 include the best
> memcpy implementation (AMD 3DNOW, __builtin_memcpy .... etc)
> Any suggestions, prior experience on this is welcome.

Sounds very interesting - it would be nice to see 'perf record' +
'perf report' profiles done on that workload, before and after your

The thing is, we obviously want to achieve those gains of 12.2% fps
and while we probably do not want to switch the kernel's memcpy to
SSE right now (the save/restore costs are significant), we could
certainly try to optimize the specific codepath that your video
playback path is hitting.

If it's some bulk memcpy in a key video driver then we could offer a
bulk-optimized x86 memcpy variant which could be called from that
driver - and that could use SSE3 as well.

So yes, if the speedup is real then i'm sure we can achieve that
speedup - but exact profiles and measurements would have to be shown.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-12 21:55    [W:0.090 / U:16.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site