lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: x86 memcpy performance
Date
melwyn lobo <linux.melwyn@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi All,
> Our Video recorder application uses memcpy for every frame. About 2KB
> data every frame on Intel® Atom™ Z5xx processor.
> With default 2.6.35 kernel we got 19.6 fps. But it seems kernel
> implemented memcpy is suboptimal, because when we replaced
> with an optmized one (using ssse3, exact patches are currently being
> finalized) ew obtained 22fps a gain of 12.2 %.

SSE3 in the kernel memcpy would be incredible expensive,
it would need a full FPU saving for every call and preemption
disabled.

I haven't seen your patches, but until you get all that
right (and add a lot more overhead to most copies) you
have a good change currently to corrupting user FPU state.

> C0 residency also reduced from 75% to 67%. This means power benefits too.
> My questions:
> 1. Is kernel memcpy profiled for optimal performance.

It depends on the CPU

There have been some improvements for Atom on newer kernels
I believe.

But then kernel memcpy is usually optimized for relatively
small copies (<= 4K) because very few kernel loads do more.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-12 20:35    [W:0.106 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site