lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
Date
Hi Sven,

On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
> > > <linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
> > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >
> > I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would
> > rather push the patch through another tree.
>
> The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch
> 01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and
> you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree".
> Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull
> request.
>
> Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by
> the responsible maintainers.
>
> 02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :)
> 04, 09 and 10 are also Acked.
> ... and the rest is waiting for actions.

OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let
me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree.

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-01 13:13    [W:0.065 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site