lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] [PATCH] include storage keys in hibernation image.
Hi!

> > I think, however, that we really should try to merge them. The only
> > difference seems to be how the additionally allocated pages will be populated
> > and what's going to happen to their contents during restore.
> >
> > ACPI will simply copy the NVS memory to those pages, while S390 will save
> > the relevant storage key bits in there.
>
> One complication to keep in mind is that we need to know which storage key
> goes to which page frame. We need something like the orig_bm/copy_bm or
> we'd have to store the pfn with the key. Simply storing the key for every
> page will make the array unnecessarily big.

How big is the overhead? In percent / in megabytes?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-03 19:49    [W:1.050 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site