Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:59:32 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for July 28 ("copy_from_user_overflow" undefined) | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:50:37 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 07/29/2011 02:45 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > [ CCing all people from 0416 patch ] >> > >> > OK, here a quick review and looking for suspicious commits: >> [snip] >> > -- a/lib/Makefile >> > +++ b/lib/Makefile >> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \ >> > proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \ >> > is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o find_next_bit.o >> > >> > +lib-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS) += usercopy.o >> > lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o >> > lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o >> > >> > So, I can rebuild next-201107{27,28} with >> > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS=y and look again if the >> > build-breakage in binfmt_misc is gone. >> > >> > Any comments from x86 folk? >> >> I already noticed this and sent a fixup patch to Andrew. Looks like he >> never picked it up. The real fix is to change that lib-$(CONFIG... to >> obj-$(CONFIG... >> >> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/6/6 for the patch. > > Thanks, that works. > > Adding Andrew to cc list. > > --- > ~Randy > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** >
I have sent out a separate patch on top of today's linux-next. Have fun!
- Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |