Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:28:43 -0400 | From | Ben Blum <> | Subject | [PATCH][BUGFIX] cgroups: more safe tasklist locking in cgroup_attach_proc |
| |
Fix unstable tasklist locking in cgroup_attach_proc.
From: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
According to this thread - https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/27/243 - RCU is not sufficient to guarantee the tasklist is stable w.r.t. de_thread and exit. Taking tasklist_lock for reading, instead of rcu_read_lock, ensures proper exclusion.
Signed-off-by: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu> --- kernel/cgroup.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c --- a/kernel/cgroup.c 2011-07-21 19:17:23.000000000 -0700 +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c 2011-07-29 06:17:47.000000000 -0700 @@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ goto out_free_group_list; /* prevent changes to the threadgroup list while we take a snapshot. */ - rcu_read_lock(); + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); if (!thread_group_leader(leader)) { /* * a race with de_thread from another thread's exec() may strip @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ * throw this task away and try again (from cgroup_procs_write); * this is "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking". */ - rcu_read_unlock(); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); retval = -EAGAIN; goto out_free_group_list; } @@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ } while_each_thread(leader, tsk); /* remember the number of threads in the array for later. */ group_size = i; - rcu_read_unlock(); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); /* * step 1: check that we can legitimately attach to the cgroup.
| |