Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:16:10 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support to install perf python extension |
| |
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:41:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:04:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > nope, I added install-python_ext since it installs to the > > > python system lib area, and it could break standard install
> > But where is that it picks the binaries built? The problem I was > > experiencing was that it wasn't obeying O=, just using the source dir
> I haven't checked the 'O=' that much.. will do :)
> > as the build dir, effectively building it again, in a different place.
> I dont have that much experince with python, but here's what I found: > (might be missing something..)
<SNIP>
> Also there might be a way to overload distutils class and put our > specific options to this new class..
> As I checked some of python extension packages, some of them > do not use distutils at all.. can't imagine why ;)
Ok, we're on the same page with that ';)' ;)
I'd love to use what is 'pythonic', i.e. whatever the python people think we should use and don't bother with all the module build/install details, but since we want to have O= working...
- Arnaldo
| |