Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:04:07 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support to install perf python extension |
| |
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:11:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:45:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > Changing the distutils to use their own default 'build' > > > directory. > > > > > > Such setup makes the install command simple, because using > > > --build-lib and --build-temp does not seem to comply with > > > the way the distutils' install commands expect it. > > > > > > Also keeping the python/perf.so file, so it could be used > > > for testing as of until now. > > > > Yeah, I gave up when I couldn't get: > > > > $ make O=/tmp/build-dir-for-perf/ -C tools/perf/ install > > > > to work, does it now? Checking... > > nope, I added install-python_ext since it installs to the > python system lib area, and it could break standard install
But where is that it picks the binaries built? The problem I was experiencing was that it wasn't obeying O=, just using the source dir as the build dir, effectively building it again, in a different place.
> I think there's a way to install python modules under $HOME, > maybe we could do that if no DESTDIR is specified.. > I can add it later ;)
Right, but this is not what I was talking about :-)
- Arnaldo
| |