Hi Russell,

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:04:41 +0100 Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > BTW, Russell, commit 29cb3cd208dd above changed the return type of
> > exynos4_cpu_suspend() from void to int but did not add any return
> > statement ...
> 
> That's fine - it ends with a call to panic() which is declared as a
> function which never returns.  Therefore, exynos4_cpu_suspend() itself
> never returns.

Ah, yes.  Unfortunately, the s5p tree changes removed the panic.  So, I
guess the merge needs some other fixup.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]