On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > allow changing dynamic_debug verbosity
>> > at boot-time, with: dynamic_debug.verbose=1
>> > or at runtime with:
>> > root@voyage:~# echo 1 > /sys/module/dynamic_debug/parameters/verbose
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  lib/dynamic_debug.c |    1 +
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>> > index 75ca78f..a3b08d5 100644
>> > --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>> > +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>> > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct ddebug_iter {
>> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(ddebug_lock);
>> >  static LIST_HEAD(ddebug_tables);
>> >  static int verbose = 0;
>> > +module_param(verbose, int, 0744);
>>
>> Why 0744 and not 0644 ? Why to set the 'executable' bit ?
>
> Yeah, that's wrong, Jim, care to fix this?
>
>

yes, sorry for not ackg.
Id had it right on the pending_ct and pending_max,
this one was a d'oh

second set forthcoming, with some of the refinements
to pending queries that Jason wanted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/