Messages in this thread |  | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] Anonymous shared memory (ashmem) subsystem | | Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:55:50 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 18 July 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> + > +#define ASHMEM_NAME_DEF "dev/ashmem" > + > +/* Return values from ASHMEM_PIN: Was the mapping purged while unpinned? */ > +#define ASHMEM_NOT_PURGED 0 > +#define ASHMEM_WAS_PURGED 1 > + > +/* Return values from ASHMEM_GET_PIN_STATUS: Is the mapping pinned? */ > +#define ASHMEM_IS_UNPINNED 0 > +#define ASHMEM_IS_PINNED 1 > + > +struct ashmem_pin { > + __u32 offset; /* offset into region, in bytes, page-aligned */ > + __u32 len; /* length forward from offset, in bytes, page-aligned */ > +}; > + > +#define __ASHMEMIOC 0x77 > + > +#define ASHMEM_SET_NAME _IOW(__ASHMEMIOC, 1, char[ASHMEM_NAME_LEN]) > +#define ASHMEM_GET_NAME _IOR(__ASHMEMIOC, 2, char[ASHMEM_NAME_LEN])
Having a name for an 'anonymous shared memory' segment is rather counter-intuitive ;-)
> +#define ASHMEM_SET_SIZE _IOW(__ASHMEMIOC, 3, size_t) > +#define ASHMEM_GET_SIZE _IO(__ASHMEMIOC, 4) > +#define ASHMEM_SET_PROT_MASK _IOW(__ASHMEMIOC, 5, unsigned long) > +#define ASHMEM_GET_PROT_MASK _IO(__ASHMEMIOC, 6)
size_t and unsigned long arguments in ioctl commands are harmful, because they require a compat_ioctl function. It's often better to just make these either __u32 or __u64.
> diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile > index 836e416..cd41f09 100644 > --- a/mm/Makefile > +++ b/mm/Makefile > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlb.o > obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += mempolicy.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) += sparse.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) += sparse-vmemmap.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ASHMEM) += ashmem.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SLOB) += slob.o > obj-$(CONFIG_COMPACTION) += compaction.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) += mmu_notifier.o
Wouldn't this better live in drivers/char, next to mem.c or even merged into that file?
> +static const struct file_operations ashmem_fops = { > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .open = ashmem_open, > + .release = ashmem_release, > + .read = ashmem_read, > + .llseek = ashmem_llseek, > + .mmap = ashmem_mmap, > + .unlocked_ioctl = ashmem_ioctl, > + .compat_ioctl = ashmem_ioctl, > +};
The compat_ioctl is wrong here, as described above.
Arnd
|  |